data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c366/8c36674978d608a2caa7ed24c24524fcfc675f23" alt="" |
Representatives from the three poorest states in the country voted overwhelmingly for the new tax bill--why? |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e897b/e897b8b560831a00eebc956fae39de602d58a9ba" alt="" |
Representatives from states with the most challenged school systems voted mostly in favor of the new tax system.
|
As I struggled to listen to the debates about the new tax bill the other night, I did a little research. I realized that representatives from states with the strongest school systems and greatest incomes did not support the new tax bill, a tax bill that would likely make those states' rich even richer.
Yet representatives from states with the overall weakest school systems and least wealth did support the bill--why would states that struggle to educate their populous support a bill that helps corporations and the wealthy more than schools and people without sufficient wages? The only answer I can think of is personal greed, but I'm open to your thoughts--why would representatives from the poorest states, states with the least rated school systems, support a tax code that greatly elevates corporations and the wealthy? Help me to understand.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f4c6/6f4c64aa1cd46b4725dc77c0e7035977c737756d" alt="" |
States with strongest school systems did not support the new tax bill.
|