Is the achievement gap, in part, due to a lack of autonomy, purpose, and mastery for students at risk?
In the book, Drive, Pink demonstrates that autonomy, purpose, and mastery are the three factors that foster positivity, good work, and strong organizations.
If we look at the history of our students who struggle, how often do they have choice and voice over their learning? How do people talk to and direct these students? What projects and activities really turn them on to learning?
This is a factor I want to learn more about. If you have thoughts or articles, let me know.
